Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Britain's Future Navy by Nick Childs. What kind of Royal Navy does Britain need now? The 21st century promises to be one of huge uncertainties and challenges for the senior service. Does Britain have the right naval strategy to cope with emerging threats does it have a naval strategy at all, and should it?
Given the time taken What kind of Royal Navy does Britain need now? Given the time taken to introduce changes and develop new systems, policy makers, naval chiefs, and designers are confronted with year decisions.
At that time, navy chiefs reluctantly accepted a reduction in surface combatant ships to a historic low of 19 down from about 50 at the end of the cold war as the price for saving the ambitious carrier plan. It is believed that Canada and BAE System have already agreed a local company across the pond will build 15 of these frigates under licence, while BAE will construct nine vessels in Australia. But her sale was just the tip of the iceberg for Royal Navy vessels flogged off over the past decade and a half. One of the dominant narratives which has emerged since the June UK vote on EU membership as been the … Continued. The proposed catapult solution known as EMALS that would have been fitted is currently being trialled in the US Navy and has proven to have significant challenges and higher than expected failure rates. Friedman: The World in 2 April pm - pm. Andrew Betton Commodore.
But future choices are likely to be clouded by economic uncertainties produced by the current crisis, which could have implications for decades. Nick Childs looks at the changing strategic environment including ever greater maritime trade and the growth of other navies such as China, India, South Korea, revolutions in North Africa and the Middle East.
pim.maier.de/var/francis/singletreff-bad-hersfeld.php He asks what Britain's role in the world could or should be - is she still interventionist? Libya says 'yes'.
What are the options for a naval strategy? The author then considers what kind of navy would be needed to support such options. What kind of ships are needed and how many? What of aircraft carriers and the nuclear option? What are the technological developments affecting current and future warship design projects? Is the new Type 45 destroyer what is needed and worth the cost?
Given the depths to which the RN has shrunk in terms of numbers, public profile, and strength relative to its peers, this probably is a critical period in terms of determining the RN's future. Get A Copy. Hardcover , pages. More Details Other Editions 1. Friend Reviews.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Britain's Future Navy , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Britain's Future Navy.
Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Firstly, the public perception of delays in the F35 programme that have reportedly slowed down delivery of the jet. Secondly, other people think that because in her early trips to sea, no F35s were embarked, this means that the carriers do not have any aircraft.
The original plan for the carriers dates back roughly 20 years, and under the initial timelines, saw the UK bringing the first carrier into service in around , with the F35 entering service in a similar time frame. This plan was changed due to the combination of budgetary challenges slowing down the carrier build time in the mids, delaying the arrival of the ships into service. At the same time, delays in bringing the F35 into service also meant that the plans changed, with both the carrier and F35 introduction to service slipping several years.
In the same rough time frame, the UK also chose to delete the Harrier from service. In the late s, the plan was for this much loved, and venerable aircraft, to stay in service until potentially around This in turn created a capability gap as in late the Royal Navy ceased to operate fixed wing aircraft at sea, but it was not due to fill it until late Between and both vessels only embarked helicopters, leading to the perception by some people that the UK possessed aircraft carriers without any aircraft. While the RN may not have been embarking fixed wing aircraft on their own ships, over in the USA a great deal of work was being done to retain the critical pool of knowledge required to conduct fixed wing operations.
The US Navy was incredibly generous in offering to provide training spots for British aircrew to qualify on the F18 Hornet, and then fly as exchange officers with US Navy squadrons.
Britain's Future Navy [Nick Childs] on elexanonde.ml *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. What kind of Royal Navy does Britain need now? The 21st century. At the beginning of the s the Royal Navy was a force designed for the Cold War. The main .. The UK had plans to order FBs for the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force. The financial crisis led to the decision taken in the Strategic.
Dozens of British pilots have qualified on the Hornet and retained the critical knowledge of how to operate at sea. At the same time, hundreds of Fleet Air Arm ground crew were embarking in US carriers on deployments to work as part of the flight deck crews, responsible for launching and recovering the aircraft. These skills are highly perishable and if not practised regularly, quickly lost. The support of the US Navy in ensuring that the Fleet Air Arm could retain enough institutional knowledge to operate safely at sea was critical to the quick regeneration of the carrier capability in When the decision was taken to withdraw the Harrier in , it was also decided that the Queen Elizabeth would be converted to a conventional carrier e.
This plan led to a delay in the build process while amendments were considered the ships were designed from the outset to be converted in this way.
These plans were quickly changed when it was identified that the proposed conversion would be expensive and potentially technologically highly risky. The proposed catapult solution known as EMALS that would have been fitted is currently being trialled in the US Navy and has proven to have significant challenges and higher than expected failure rates. Not only would this plan have significantly reduced the ability of the RN to put carriers to sea, it would also have made it harder to keep them deployed due to the need to train pilots and qualify them on carrier landings.
Had the QE been converted, then Britain would have potentially ended up with a part time carrier navy unable to deploy very often. These have been under production for some years now with the first three being delivered in , and the UK force has now grown to some 17 aircraft, with more being delivered on a regular basis.
On current plans, by there will be a front-line force of around two squadrons of aircraft, plus an Operational Conversion Unit in service. So, if the UK has the aircraft now, why did the Queen Elizabeth spend her first year in service without any aircraft onboard? Ships are remarkably complicated pieces of machinery and require significant amounts of trials and testing to make sure they work as planned. When the QE sailed for the first time in , she needed to be put through an intensive series of sea trials to make sure that she worked as required.
These trials were the first step in a process that takes many months as every part of the vessel must be checked to make sure that it works correctly. The trials cover everything from ship handling through to speed trials and making sure that all the systems work as intended.
A warship is an incredibly complex platform to operate and making sure that the systems ranging from navigation radars to internal communications to plumbing to firefighting systems all work as planned and can work together without a problem is critical. To that end the ship did not sail with any fixed wing aircraft embarked, although within hours of sailing Merlin helicopters were landing onboard. The reason for this was because operating a jet at sea is a very challenging, and potentially dangerous operation.
Before you do this, you need to be certain that the ship works as planned, and that there are no unanticipated defects or problems that could cause an accident. After her initial sea trials, the QE then deployed on a second set of trials designed to discover how she could handle multiple helicopter operations, and how the vessel handled in different weather scenarios, including very bad weather.
The reason for this was to build up a set of data that gives an accurate understanding of the ships capabilities, and more importantly the limitations that could constrain how she works.
For example, the state of the weather is a major factor in determining whether a ship can, or cannot, operate aircraft.